Categories: Uncategorized

Is 4K Practical?

Have you ever bought a tv with the very latest in super-premium, mind-blowing display technology only to realize that it’s almost too cutting edge? You turn it on and it’s amazing! Any more detail and you’d be seeing into another dimension. Then your internet takes a nap and you realize that even though you have more pixels than raindrops in a storm cloud, it doesn’t matter if you don’t have a fast enough connection to handle all that extra data.

A similar issue was covered by a recent blog post in which Chris Kranky explored whether 4K video for WebRTC is achievable. His conclusion is that while technically possible, the bandwidth required for such a thing isn’t practical with today’s Internet infrastructure. However, this doesn’t entirely rule out 4K WebRTC. While his analysis is spot on when considering a video conferencing use case, this isn’t always true for a one to many broadcast.

Let’s break it down. Live Streaming and Video Conferencing are two very different animals, and it’s important to understand their differences in order to assess the viability of using 4K quality video.

Video Conferencing

For a video conference system, you need an upstream and a downstream for each user of the system. Sending out 4k video would require at least 15 MBPS up and down. With a one to one setup, that might be okay on some Internet connections. However, once you add an additional user, you need another 15MB in both directions for that connection. Since most people don’t have an internet connection able to handle that much data, conferencing would be impractical.

One to Many

Alternatively, a one to many broadcast presents a more viable scenario (as Chris already mentioned in his post). Considering that global internet speeds are increasing, your connection should be able to handle simply viewing the stream (like Netflix). Granted their on-demand system can introduce a nice sized buffer to allow for hiccups in the stream, but the main concept of only one stream coming down the pipe is still relevant for a low-latency live WebRTC stream.

Red5 Pro can handle 4K streams without any problems, so as long as the broadcaster has the bandwidth to send the stream, we can scale to handle millions of concurrent streams to individual clients who have at least 15MB of bandwidth on their downstream. If Netflix can do this with MPEG-DASH, then you too can stream high-quality 4k video to your viewers with under a second of latency.

Red5 Team

Share
Published by
Red5 Team

Recent Posts

Red5 on OCI vs AWS IVS: Why Oracle Cloud Infrastructure is an Excellent Choice for Live Streaming

As organizations evaluate live streaming solutions, Amazon Interactive Video Service (IVS) has emerged as a…

6 days ago

What’s New in Red5 Cloud v1.9.2? Valuable UI/UX Improvements and Bug Fixes

Let’s go over the latest updates introduced in Red5 Cloud since our previous blog covering…

6 days ago

Real-Time Streaming Solutions for 2025: Red5 vs. Phenix vs. Dolby Optiview

When businesses need ultra-low latency streaming capabilities, the choice of platform can significantly influence the…

2 weeks ago

AWS IVS vs Red5: Choosing the Right Live Streaming Solution for Your Business

1Understanding AWS IVS: Strengths and Limitations2Red5: A More Flexible Alternative3When to Choose Red5 Over AWS…

4 weeks ago

What’s New in Red5 Pro v14.2.1 and Red5 Cloud v1.9.1?

Let’s take a look at the latest Red5 Pro and Red5 Cloud releases introduced since…

1 month ago

AV1 vs VP9 vs. VP8: Complete Codec Evolution and Comparison for Live Streaming

1Quick Comparison Overview2The Complete Evolution: VP8 → VP9 → AV13Technical Comparison: VP8 vs VP9 vs…

1 month ago