AV1 vs VP9 vs. VP8: Complete Codec Evolution and Comparison for Live Streaming

Video codecs are the backbone of modern streaming technology, determining everything from video quality to bandwidth efficiency. Google’s open-source codec family—VP8, VP9, and AV1—represents a complete evolution of video compression technology over the past decade. Understanding the progression and differences between these codecs is crucial for streaming platforms, content creators, and developers making infrastructure decisions.

This codec family emerged from Google’s acquisition of On2 Technologies in 2010 and the subsequent Alliance for Open Media’s mission to create royalty-free, open-source video standards. From VP8’s foundational work to AV1’s cutting-edge compression, each codec has played a vital role in democratizing high-quality video streaming.

Quick Comparison Overview

Feature	VP8	VP9	AV1
Release Year	2010	2013	2018
Compression vs H.264	Comparable	~50% better¹	~50% better than VP9²
Encoding Speed	Fast	Medium	Slow (improving)
Browser Support	Universal (legacy)	Universal	Growing rapidly
Hardware Acceleration	Limited	Widely available	Emerging
Live Streaming Ready	Yes	Yes	Developing
Royalty-Free	Yes	Yes	Yes

The Complete Evolution: VP8 → VP9 → AV1

VP8: The Foundation (2010)

VP8 was Google’s first major foray into open-source video compression after acquiring On2 Technologies. Released in 2010 and subsequently open-sourced, VP8 was designed to compete directly with H.264 while remaining completely royalty-free³. It became the foundation for WebM container format and was widely adopted for web-based video applications.

VP9: The Breakthrough (2013)

VP9, released by Google in 2013, represented a significant leap forward in compression efficiency. It was designed as an open-source alternative to the proprietary H.265/HEVC codec and offered substantial improvements over both VP8 and H.264⁴. VP9 became widely adopted across YouTube, Netflix, and other major streaming platforms.

AV1: The Future (2018)

AV1, finalized in 2018, builds upon VP9’s foundation while incorporating advanced compression techniques developed by the Alliance for Open Media. This consortium includes industry giants like Google, Mozilla, Netflix, Amazon, and Apple, ensuring broad industry support for the standard⁵.

Technical Comparison: VP8 vs VP9 vs AV1

Performance Metrics

Metric	VP8	VP9	AV1	VP8→VP9	VP9→AV1
Compression vs H.264	~10% better⁶	~50% better¹	~30% better than VP9²	+40%	+30%
Encoding Complexity	Low	Medium	High	+3x⁷	+10x⁸
Decoding Complexity	Low	Low-Medium	Medium	+1.5x⁷	+2x⁸
Max Resolution	1080p optimized	4K/8K capable	8K+ optimized	4x	2x
HDR Support	None	Basic	Advanced	✓	Enhanced

Compression Efficiency Evolution

VP8 Characteristics:

• Provided compression efficiency comparable to H.264 baseline
• Used 4×4 and 16×16 block-based transform coding
• Employed simple loop filtering and basic entropy coding
• Optimized primarily for web-based 720p/1080p content⁹

VP9 Improvements:

• Delivered approximately 50% better compression than VP8¹
• Introduced variable block sizes from 4×4 to 64×64 pixels
• Advanced loop filtering and improved motion prediction
• Better handling of high-resolution content up to 8K¹⁰

AV1 Advances:

• Achieves 30-50% better compression efficiency than VP9²
• Advanced block partitioning with up to 128×128 superblocks
• Sophisticated intra-prediction with 56 directional modes¹¹
• Enhanced entropy coding with symbol-adaptive arithmetic coding

Encoding Performance Through Generations

VP8 Performance:

• Fast encoding suitable for real-time applications
• Low computational requirements
• Mature, optimized encoder implementations
• Predictable performance across hardware platforms

VP9 Performance:

• Moderate encoding complexity, 2-3x slower than VP8⁷
• Well-optimized implementations available (libvpx)
• Hardware acceleration widely available
• Good balance of quality and encoding speed

AV1 Performance:

• Significantly higher computational complexity (5-10x slower than VP9)⁸
• Rapidly improving software optimizations
• Hardware encoding acceleration emerging in latest processors
• Quality gains justify computational cost for many applications

Browser and Device Support Evolution

Complete Support Matrix

Browser/Platform	VP8 Support	VP9 Support	AV1 Support
Chrome	✅ Since 2010	✅ Since 2014	✅ Since 2018
Firefox	✅ Since 2012	✅ Since 2014	✅ Since 2019
Safari	✅ Since 2013	✅ Since 2020	✅ Since 2021
Edge	✅ Full	✅ Full	✅ Since 2019
Android	✅ Native	✅ Native	⚠️ Android 10+
iOS	✅ Since iOS 7	✅ Since iOS 14	⚠️ iOS 14+
Smart TVs	✅ Legacy support	✅ Widespread	🔄 2020+ models

Hardware Acceleration Timeline

VP8 Hardware Support:

• Limited hardware acceleration
• Primarily software-based decoding
• Some GPU-assisted implementations

VP9 Hardware Acceleration:

• Widespread hardware decoding since 2015¹²
• Available in Intel Skylake+, AMD Polaris+, NVIDIA Maxwell+
• Mobile SoC support in Snapdragon 820+, Apple A10+

AV1 Hardware Acceleration:

• Intel Tiger Lake (11th gen) and newer¹³
• Apple M1 and M2 processors¹⁴
• AMD Ryzen 6000+ series
• NVIDIA RTX 30/40 series for decoding¹⁵

Live Streaming Performance Analysis

VP8 in Live Streaming

VP8 established the foundation for web-based live streaming:

• Low latency encoding perfect for real-time applications
• Broad compatibility across older devices
• Reliable performance with predictable resource usage
• Still used in legacy WebRTC implementations

VP9 in Live Streaming

VP9 became the mainstream choice for quality live streaming:

• Excellent quality-to-bandwidth ratio
• Mature integration with WebRTC protocols
• Hardware acceleration enables real-time encoding
• Optimal for interactive streaming requiring sub-500ms latency

AV1 for Live Streaming

AV1 represents the future of premium live streaming:

• Superior compression reduces bandwidth costs by 30-50%²
• Higher encoding latency currently limits real-time applications
• Growing hardware acceleration support improves viability
• Ideal for high-quality, bandwidth-constrained scenarios

Implementation Considerations with Red5 Pro

Red5 Pro’s ultra-low latency streaming infrastructure supports the complete VP codec family, enabling flexible implementation strategies:

VP8 Implementation

• Broad compatibility with legacy devices and browsers
• Minimal computational requirements
• Reliable fallback option for older hardware
• Suitable for basic quality streaming applications

VP9 Implementation

• Current mainstream choice for balanced performance
• Excellent integration with WebRTC protocols
• Hardware acceleration widely available
• Optimal for most interactive streaming scenarios

AV1 Integration

• Future-focused implementation for premium applications
• Exceptional bandwidth efficiency
• Growing ecosystem support
• Strategic choice for next-generation streaming

Red5 Pro’s adaptive streaming capabilities can automatically select the optimal codec based on client capabilities, device support, and network conditions, ensuring the best possible experience for each viewer.

Migration Strategy: VP8 → VP9 → AV1

Legacy VP8 Migration

Organizations still using VP8 should prioritize VP9 migration:

• Immediate 40-50% bandwidth savings¹
• Maintained compatibility across devices
• Improved quality at equivalent bitrates
• Hardware acceleration benefits

VP9 to AV1 Transition

Current VP9 implementations can gradually adopt AV1:

Phase 1: Assessment

• Evaluate current VP9 performance metrics
• Test AV1 encoding with representative content
• Assess target audience device capabilities
• Calculate potential bandwidth cost savings

Phase 2: Hybrid Deployment

• Implement AV1 for supported devices with VP9 fallback
• Monitor quality and performance across both codecs
• Optimize encoding parameters independently
• Gradually increase AV1 usage as support expands

Phase 3: Full AV1 Adoption

• Transition primary encoding to AV1 where supported
• Maintain VP9 for legacy device compatibility
• Implement intelligent codec selection algorithms
• Monitor long-term performance and cost benefits

Cost and Bandwidth Analysis

Bandwidth Efficiency Progression

Codec	Relative Bitrate	Bandwidth Savings vs H.264	Quality Improvement
VP8	90% of H.264⁶	~10% savings	Comparable
VP9	50% of H.264¹	~50% savings	Better
AV1	35% of H.264²	~65% savings	Significantly better

Economic Implications

VP8 Economics:

• Low computational costs
• Minimal hardware requirements
• Moderate bandwidth efficiency
• Cost-effective for basic applications

VP9 Economics:

• Balanced computational and bandwidth costs
• Significant bandwidth savings justify encoding overhead
• Hardware acceleration reduces operational costs
• Proven ROI for medium to high-scale deployments

AV1 Economic Benefits:

• Highest compression efficiency reduces bandwidth costs by 30-50%²
• Initial encoding cost premium offset by bandwidth savings
• Growing hardware acceleration reduces computational overhead
• Strong long-term economic benefits for high-volume applications

Future Outlook and Strategic Recommendations

Current Market Position (2025)

• VP8: Legacy support and basic applications
• VP9: Mainstream choice for most streaming applications
• AV1: Premium applications and future-focused implementations

Short-term Strategy (1-2 years)

• VP9 remains optimal for latency-critical live streaming
• AV1 adoption accelerates for high-quality, bandwidth-sensitive applications
• Hybrid approaches maximize compatibility and efficiency
• Hardware acceleration makes AV1 increasingly viable

Long-term Vision (3-5 years)

• AV1 becomes the dominant open-source codec
• VP9 maintains relevance for specific compatibility requirements
• VP8 relegated to legacy system support
• Next-generation codecs (AV2) enter development phase¹⁶

Conclusion

The evolution from VP8 through VP9 to AV1 represents more than a decade of advancement in open-source video compression technology. Each codec has served its purpose: VP8 established the foundation for royalty-free web video, VP9 delivered the quality and efficiency needed for mainstream adoption, and AV1 pushes the boundaries of what’s possible in video compression.

For organizations making codec decisions today, VP9 offers the best balance of quality, performance, and compatibility for most live streaming applications. AV1 provides a strategic path forward for premium applications and future-proofing, while VP8 remains relevant for legacy compatibility requirements.

Red5 Pro’s comprehensive support for all three codecs enables organizations to implement optimal strategies based on their specific requirements, audience capabilities, and quality objectives. Whether maintaining VP8 for legacy support, leveraging VP9 for mainstream applications, or pioneering with AV1 for next-generation streaming, Red5 Pro provides the infrastructure foundation for success.

The codec landscape continues evolving rapidly, but the VP codec family’s commitment to open standards and royalty-free licensing ensures these technologies will remain accessible and viable for organizations of all sizes in an increasingly video-centric digital world.

---

Ready to optimize your streaming infrastructure with the complete VP codec family? Contact Red5 Pro to learn how our ultra-low latency platform can enhance your video streaming applications with VP8, VP9, and AV1 support.

References

1. Bankoski, J., et al. (2013). “VP9 Bitstream & Decoding Process Specification.” Google Inc.
2. Chen, Y., et al. (2021). “An Overview of Core Coding Tools in the AV1 Video Codec.” Netflix Technology Blog.
3. Bankoski, J., et al. (2011). “VP8 Data Format and Decoding Guide.” RFC 6386, IETF.
4. Mukherjee, D., et al. (2013). “The latest open-source video codec VP9.” IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.
5. Alliance for Open Media (2018). “AV1 Bitstream & Decoding Process Specification.”
6. Ohm, J., et al. (2012). “Comparison of the Coding Efficiency of Video Coding Standards.” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.
7. De Cock, J., et al. (2016). “Complexity analysis of next-generation video coding standards.” SPIE Applications of Digital Image Processing.
8. Grois, D., et al. (2019). “Performance comparison of AV1, JEM, VP9, and HEVC encoders.” SPIE Applications of Digital Image Processing.
9. Bankoski, J., et al. (2011). “Technical overview of VP8, an open source video codec for the web.” IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo.
10. Google Developers (2014). “VP9 Video Codec.” Technical Documentation.
11. Han, J., et al. (2018). “A Technical Overview of AV1.” Proceedings of the IEEE.
12. Intel Corporation (2016). “Intel Quick Sync Video and VP9 Codec.” Technical Brief.
13. Intel Corporation (2020). “11th Gen Intel Core Processors AV1 Hardware Decode.” Technical Documentation.
14. Apple Inc. (2021). “Apple Silicon and AV1 Hardware Acceleration.” Developer Documentation.
15. NVIDIA Corporation (2020). “GeForce RTX 30 Series AV1 Decode Support.” Technical Specifications.
16. Alliance for Open Media (2023). “AV2 Development Roadmap.” Technical Roadmap.